Showing posts with label Charles Prezant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charles Prezant. Show all posts

Monday, April 4, 2016

Using multiple census records to prove your family.

Yesterday, I blogged about the Prezant family and to make it easier, I put their information into a spreadsheet.


Spreadsheets make it so easy to compare dates, names and places.  When you look at them across the line, you can quickly point out any obvious errors, such as the fact that Sarah and Etta could not have been born 6 months apart - and that was corrected in the 1910 census.

And that Hirsch is not in the 1885, 1900 or 1910 census. He must have died before 1885.

Next, I went in search of a ship's arrival manifest.  There was a list made when they got on the ship in Europe, and one made when they arrived in New York City.  Found this:


which was transcribed as this:



Yet when magnified (and put into photoshop with even more filters)


I can see the first name as possibly a spelling of Zallel, i.e., Zallael and the last name looking more like Br....ant...Brnerantt or Breisantt.  (Can you see how this later turned int Prezant?)

Nel - could easily be Kel - look at how her first name transitioned in these few short years.
And they have "Mary" as a male age 8.  Yet I can clearly see Itzag.  Can you?
Horrih - easily Hirsch.

(I should point out that Charles was a common Americanization of the Jewish name Zallel.)

So let's add a new column to the spreadsheet to include the arrival manifest:


Pretty sure we have a match.  They arrived June 17, 1882, and Hirsch was 10/12 months old at that time.  They immediately left for Cotopaxi.  So what happened to Hirsch as he is not listed in the 1885 census.

Carol Friedman is a descendant of this line and she has done extensive research and has not found information on Hirsch.  I have not found any other descendants who have information on him.

Because of the huge range of possible spellings of the surname between 1882 and 1885, it would be nearly impossible to search the Denver cemetery lists.

So the questions will remain unanswered for future researchers.  Hirsch must have died sometime between June 1882 and June 1885.  Was he buried at Cotopaxi?   We do not know.

I found a Charles Prizent living at 369 Larimer St in the 1884 city directory.  Same name in the 1885 directory as a "ragman".  Did not locate him in the 1883 city directory.  So if Hirsch died while in Cotopaxi, it would have been within a year of arrival.

Just to share with you how much a Yiddish/Russian/German surname changed between 1882 and 1930 here's what we have for this family:

Breisand - ship's departure manifest
Bonerannt - ship's arrival manifest
Prizent - 1884/1885 Denver city directories
Trissoml - 1885 census
Prezant - 1900 census
Rrezant - 1910 census
Prezont - 1920 census
Poezant - 1930 census

Some of these are obvious typing errors, others can be shown as transcription errors.  It is so hard to read old handwriting.  But it is so worth it in the long run!!  At least I've clarified this much for future researchers.

Hirsch Prezant.  1881 to pre 1885.  Hopefully one day we will learn more about him.  Until then....may his memory be a blessing.


***** c2016Cotopaxi-Colony.blogspot.com  All content is copyright protected and may not be copied, reproduced, reused or reposted in any manner without permission.


Sunday, April 3, 2016

The 1885 census - it's such a mess!

Here's what I will show you in this blog about searching census records:

1)  Some websites skip a column or page from a census when indexing it
2)  Some websites have much better scans of images than other websites
3)  People who read the handwriting and typed it in made a lot of mistakes - some rather significant
4)  Be sure to compare the sex of a person, the date of birth, and the order of the family
5)  Find a relative or neighbor of your family first, then use that to find your family living close by
6)  Remember that at the turn of the century, a lot of families moved/lived together in clusters.
7)  Take your time - what you are looking for is probably there!

First off....there is no 1885 census for Fremont County.  But there is!  The story goes that someone found an alphabetized list of the 1885 Census tucked up in the top of the rafters of a basement somewhere here in town.  And that list is at the local history center.  So if you want to see if a person lived here in 1885, you can do that.  But it doesn't show what family they were living with or who their neighbors were....it's just an alphabetical list.  It has never been transcribed so you won't find it anywhere except by visiting the local history center!

I have used it to prove that none of the Cotopaxi Colonists were here in 1885.  Neither was Saltiel, Hart, Tobias or Schwarz.

But the bigger mess is Denver and how ancestry.com and familysearch.org have failed us in the digitization and indexing of names.  While I am using the families who were at Cotopaxi in my example, you can use the process for any name, any year, any location.

I first found the Shames family living downtown Denver in the 1885 census at ancestry:


I took this image, put it into photoshop, converted it to a "stamp" and could finally see that it was:

Isaac Shames with his daughters Rachel Shames and Nettie Washington.  And I already knew from the Cotopaxi documents that Isaac had a daughter married to Joe Washington (later shortened to Washer).

Ancestry had transcribed this as:


This is on the bottom left of page 42, Arapahoe County, District 5 if you subscribe to ancestry and want to look it up.

I found his 2 brothers, S. Malsten and B. Muhlstein above him.

I felt that the Colonists probably lived close together in Denver, so I started looking at pages on this census before and after the Shames/Milstein family.  In the next column on this page, I found the Krupitsky, Prezant and Toplitsky families.

Krupitsky had been transcribed as Ruhhitsky.  (OK, trust me, this did not all happen on the same day!  I have been working on this for the last 10 years!!)

Prezant - transcribed as Trissoml 

Toplitsky - transcribed as Tehiock

It takes patience....and great skill to really understand the 1885 census!

I'm going to use Prezant as my example here.  After taking the image and working on it in Photoshop, I was pretty sure the surname was Priscrant.  And it is clear enough on the first names:

Chas, age 30
Carrie, age 28
Joseph, age 11
Sarah, age 7 7/12.

I had already found their ship's manifest:



Here they were transcribed as:

Zattel Breisand, age 28, born 1854
Kele Breisand, age 26, born 1856
Itzag Breisand, age 8, born 1874
Hirsch Breisand, age not given, presumed to be a newborn, so given a date of 1882.

And I had found them in the 1900 census in Denver as:

Charles Prezant, age 45
Clara Prezant, age 43
Sarah Prezant, age 15, born Nov 1885
Etta Prezant, age 14, born Mar 1886
Nettie Prezant, age 11, born Sep 1888
Belle Prezant, age 9, born Aug 1890
Rosa Prezant, age 8, born 1892
Jessie Prezant, age 2, born Sep 1897
Abrie Prezant, age 4, born Oct 1895
Eda Prezant, age 1, born Jul 1898

Clara stated that she had given birth to 14 children, 9 were still living.  Eight were still living at home.  Their oldest son, Joseph, was married and living next door to Michael Shames and his family in Weld County.  They were all farmers.  In the 1900 Census, Joseph is age 26, making him born about 1873.


That makes him age 11 in 1885.  That lines up with Joseph in the 1885 Census above, and Itzag, age 8, in 1882 on the ship's manifest.  But where is Hirsch?  And notice, Clara could not have had a child born in Nov 1885 and another born in Mar 1886!   Read the census!!!

All of these records came from ancestry.com.  Next, I wanted to see what was on familysearch.org.  So I took a look there and wow!  What a difference in the scans of the census!  Familysearch is so much better!!!



That's Isaac Shames, and his daughters Rachel and Nettie.  Transcribed as Shamus and Warsburger.

 I could not find the Presents by searching. I found them by simply looking at column 2 on this page:


Familysearch skipped the entire right hand column of this page when they transcribed the census!  Not a single family will show up when you do a search!  The only way to find these families is to "know" where to look - you find them in ancestry first, then go to familysearch to look at the better scan!  What a pain!!!

So how many people have missed finding their families because they do not go page by page looking for them?

How many people can't find a family because of the transcription of a surname?

I grew up in a fairly small farming community in Indiana and a long time ago, I went through the 1930 census and corrected the spelling of all the surnames for that township.  Because I knew how the names were spelled.  And for such a small community, I couldn't believe the number of surnames that had been incorrectly typed.  I could read them clearly, but someone who did not know what the names were....I could see how they could get it wrong just by looking at handwriting and not knowing what the name was.  It was a fascinating lesson in research for me!

So take Denver in the 1885 census and these are Yiddish speaking Russian Germans.  No wonder the names were handwritten the way they were....and then the person who indexed these had to simply guess at what the letters in the handwriting were - especially when you look at the poorly scanned image on ancestry.

And yes - ancestry and family search have different transcriptions of what the surname is.  The records were independently transcribed by each agency and they simply do not match up!

I have found things on ancestry that I cannot find on other websites.  And vice versa.  That's why I look at the census and read it line by line.  Yes - it takes an incredible amount of time.  But I have found things that no one else can find.  And now, you know why!!!

Next up - a closer look at the Prezant family.



***** c2016Cotopaxi-Colony.blogspot.com  All content is copyright protected and may not be copied, reproduced, reused or reposted in any manner without permission.